Skip to content
AETF Learning Hub
Assignment3 to 4 hours

Case Study Assignment: Design a Cutting and Recovery Plan

Assignment Brief

Select one of the five athlete case studies from Lesson 2.2. Using the Weight Cut Planning Worksheet, produce a complete cutting and recovery plan.

Your plan must include:

  1. Athlete profile and risk assessment - Complete the athlete profile summary and identify the specific performance and health risks for your selected scenario.
  2. Flow chart application with justified path selection - Work through the Reale et al. decision flow chart. Record each decision node, the outcome, and your reasoning.
  3. Day-by-day cutting strategy - Specify the tactic, the goal, and monitoring notes for each day from the start of the plan to the weigh-in.
  4. Rehydration and recovery plan - Calculate fluid replacement targets. Specify carbohydrate refeeding amounts and food choices. Account for the available recovery time.
  5. Reflection and justification - Explain why you selected these strategies for this athlete. Describe how risk is reduced. Identify what the athlete needs to understand.

Weighting

This assignment is worth 60% of the course grade.

Submission

  1. Download the Weight Cut Planning Worksheet template from Lesson 2.1.
  2. Complete all six sections of the worksheet for your chosen scenario.
  3. Submit the completed worksheet through the assignment submission area on this page.

Grade Descriptors

Grade

Mark

Descriptor

A1

80%+

Comprehensive, personalised plans; fully aligned with flowchart logic; evidence-based decisions with extensive scientific citation; flawless presentation

A2

75%+

Accurate and thoughtful plans; minor lapses in detail; effective use of scientific rationale; well-presented

B1

70%+

Strong logic and mostly complete strategy; good use of webinar content; small weaknesses in justification or individualisation

B2

65%+

Solid attempt at tailoring plans; relies more on general logic than cited evidence; some presentation errors

B3

60%+

Meets core criteria but lacks refinement; justification is basic or incomplete

C1

55%+

Functionally complete but vague or formulaic; weak citation use

C2

50%+

Incomplete planning or misapplication of flowchart; limited rationale

C3

45%+

Significant omissions or errors; misalignment with athlete needs

D1

40%+

Generic or unrealistic plan; no safety considerations

D2

35%+

Unsafe, unspecific, or missing major elements

F

<35%

Incomplete or factually incorrect; no alignment with best practice

Sign in to submit your assignment